Peer Review Policy

The Journal of the Institute for Biblical Aramaic Studies (JIBAS) is committed to maintaining high standards of academic integrity and rigor through a robust peer review process. Our peer review policy is designed to ensure that all submissions are evaluated fairly, transparently, and impartially, based on their academic merit, originality, and contribution to the field of Biblical Aramaic studies.

Double-Blind Peer Review

JIBAS follows a double-blind peer review process to ensure impartiality. In this process, the identities of both authors and reviewers are concealed from each other. This helps maintain objectivity and allows for an unbiased evaluation of the manuscript’s quality, strengths, and areas for improvement.

Review Process

  1. Initial Submission Review: Upon submission, the editorial team conducts an initial review to ensure that the manuscript aligns with the journal’s scope, formatting requirements, and ethical standards.

  2. Assignment of Reviewers: Manuscripts that pass the initial review are assigned to two independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant field. These reviewers evaluate the manuscript’s quality, originality, methodology, and contribution to Biblical Aramaic studies.

  3. Review Criteria: Reviewers are asked to assess the manuscript based on several criteria:

    • Relevance and originality of the research question
    • Clarity and rigor of the methodology
    • Accuracy and depth of analysis
    • Contribution to the field of Biblical Aramaic studies
    • Quality of writing and presentation

  4. Reviewer Recommendations: Reviewers will provide one of the following recommendations:

    • Accept as is
    • Minor revisions required
    • Major revisions required
    • Reject

  5. Editorial Decision: Based on the reviewers’ feedback and recommendations, the editorial team makes a final decision. Authors are notified of the decision and provided with anonymous feedback from the reviewers to improve their work.

  6. Revisions: If revisions are required, authors are invited to resubmit their revised manuscripts, which may be re-evaluated by the same reviewers or additional reviewers as necessary.

Timeframe

JIBAS strives to complete the peer review process within [X weeks, e.g., 8–12 weeks], although this may vary depending on reviewer availability and the complexity of the manuscript.

Ethical Considerations

JIBAS adheres to the highest ethical standards in scholarly publishing. Reviewers are required to declare any conflicts of interest and treat all manuscripts confidentially. Any form of plagiarism, data fabrication, or unethical conduct will result in rejection and potential notification to relevant institutions.

 

Note for Authors: The peer review process is integral to maintaining the quality and integrity of the Journal of the Institute for Biblical Aramaic Studies. We deeply appreciate the valuable contributions of our authors and reviewers, whose efforts ensure that our publications reflect the latest and most rigorous scholarship in the field of Biblical Aramaic studies.