Pluralisme Hukum Tuhan: Dialektika Ortodoksi, Ortolatri, dan Ortopraksi dalam Konstruksi Hukum Ilahi Partikular dan Universal
Kata Kunci:
Hukum Ilahi, Ortodoksi, Ortolatri, Ortopraksi, Pluralisme HukumAbstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pluralisme hukum Tuhan melalui dialektika ortodoksi, ortolatri, dan ortopraksi dengan memusatkan perhatian pada diferensiasi kewajiban berdasarkan subjek, fungsi, dan cakupan normatif dalam hukum partikular dan universal. Penelitian menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan teologi komparatif dan studi kepustakaan terhadap literatur akademik serta sumber keagamaan yang membahas hukum Yahudi, Kristen, Hindu, dan Buddha. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pluralisme hukum Tuhan tidak identik dengan relativisme kebenaran agama, melainkan dapat dipahami sebagai diferensiasi normatif antara kewajiban partikular dan universal. Pembedaan 613 mitzvot dan Tujuh Hukum Nuh dalam Yudaisme menjadi contoh paling eksplisit, sementara Lex Naturalis, Sadharana Dharma, dan Pancha Sila menunjukkan pola normativitas yang dapat dibandingkan. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa doktrin, ritual, dan etika tidak selalu memiliki cakupan kewajiban yang sama, sehingga partikularitas ritual dapat berdampingan dengan orientasi etis universal.
Unduhan
Referensi
Abu Baedah, S. S., Musolin, M. H., & Nurlaelah. (2026). Dialectics of Fiqh al-Ikhtilāf: A comparative Madhhab analysis of legal pluralism in contemporary Muslim societies. Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab. https://doi.org/10.24252/m azahibuna.vi.64995
Anggraeni, R. R. D. (2023). Islamic law and customary law in contemporary legal pluralism in Indonesia: Tension and constraints. AHKAM: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v23i1.32549
Ayoub, S. A. (2022). A theory of a state? How civil law ended legal pluralism in modern Egypt. Journal of Law and Religion, 37(1), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2021.79
Bajwa, K. S., & Miller, S. E. (2023). Liberalism versus liberalism: An analysis of Muslim-American amicus curiae arguments concerning complicity-based conscience claims. Journal of Law and Religion, 38(2), 224–248. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2023.12
Barnes, B. R. (2021). The Noahide Laws and the Universal Fellowship with God. Rocznik Teologii Katolickiej, 20, 5–32. https://repozytorium.uwb.edu.pl/jspui/handle/11320/12441
Berryman, J. (2024). Vows without a self. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Blanch, S. (2023). Legal pluralism and Islamic law in Australia. Australian Journal of Law and Religion, 3, 37–51.
Bodhiprasiddhinand, P. (2024). Buddhist ethics for improving health and well-being during pandemics like COVID-19 with special references to modern scientific experiments. Religions, 15(4), 511. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15040511
Boulouque, C. (2020). Another Modernity: Elia Benamozegh’s Jewish Universalism. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9781503612006.001.0001
Boulouque, C. (2020). Normativity and inclusivity in modernity: The role and limits of the Noahide laws. In Another Modernity: Elia Benamozegh’s Jewish Universalism (pp. 83–92). Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9781503612006.003.0008
Bowers, J. (2021). Accommodating difference: How is religious freedom protected when it clashes with other rights; is reasonable accommodation the key to levelling the field? Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 10(2), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwab008
Calo, Z. R. (2024). The Catholic modernity of Pope Benedict XVI: Healthy secularity and Christian jurisprudence. Australian Journal of Law and Religion, 4, 1–16.
Chaibi, M. (2023). Religion and pluralism before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: From individualizing religious freedom to deregulating the religious market. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 11(2–3), 246–262. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwad009
Cherlow, E. (2024). The Noahide commandments in the Jerusalem Talmud from a Cairo Geniza fragment. Jewish Quarterly Review, 114(3), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1353/jqr.2024.a936351
Collins, J. J. (2017). The Invention of Judaism: Torah and Jewish Identity from Deuteronomy to Paul. University of California Press.
Cornille, C. (2023). Comparing the tertium comparationis in comparative religion and comparative theology. Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft, 31(2), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfr-2023-0027
Crowe, J. (2024). Natural law with and without God. Australian Journal of Law and Religion, 4, 17–33. https://doi.org/10.55803/w085n
Dane, P. (2025). In a time of crisis: Reflections on the fortieth anniversary of the Journal of Law and Religion. Journal of Law and Religion. Cambridge University Press.
Das, M. (2023). The legitimacy of Varnashrama Dharma in Indian Dharma Shastras: A critical analysis. International Education and Research Journal, 9(11).
Das, M. (2024). Pratiloma paranoia: Class hierarchy, conservatism, and ethics in classical Hindu law. Religions, 15(7), 820.
Davies, M. (2024). Comparative law and Christianity—A plank in the eye? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 44(1), 54–78. https://academic.oup.com/ojls/article/44/1/54/7292876
Emon, A. M., Levering, M., & Novak, D. (Eds.). (2014). Natural Law: A Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Trialogue. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198706601.001.0001
Faisal, M., et al. (2024). Political theology: How God’s law is applied in the context of Indonesian democracy based on Pancasila. Cogent Arts & Humanities. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2407104
Farrell, D. (Ed.). (2023). Traditions of Natural Law in Medieval Philosophy. Catholic University of America Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.2711714
Fisher, M. J. (2024). Theology as embodied: How tangible theology offers a new invitation to embodied people. Dialog, 63, 174–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/dial.12860
Fleming, C. T. (2024). Dharmaśāstra and the legal personality of deities in the Ayodhya verdicts (2010 & 2019). Contemporary South Asia, 32(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/09584935.2023.2281649
Gervais, W. M. (2023). Comparing moralities in the Abrahamic and Indic religions using cognitive science. Religions, 14(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14020203
Giles, J. (2023). The interrelationship between freedom of thought, conscience, and religion and the rule of law. Journal of Law and Religion, 38(3), 376–402. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2023.28
Hall, B., & Ferg, E. (2023). Orthodoxy, orthopraxy, and Locke’s arguments for toleration. Locke Studies, 22, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.5206/ls.2022.15111
Hariri, A., & Babussalam, B. (2024). Legal pluralism: Concept, theoretical dialectics, and its existence in Indonesia. Walisongo Law Review, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.21580/walrev.2024.6.2.25566
Hayes, C. (2015). What’s Divine about Divine Law? Early Perspectives. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691165196.001.0001
Hayes, C. (2021). Noah and Moses in Acts 15: Group models and the novelty of the way. New Testament Studies, 67(4), 496–513. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688521000199
Hosle, P. K., & Dai, B. (2025). Understanding the theology of natural and divine laws in the cultural and philosophical context of late Ming China. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies.
Itthipuyho, P. B. (2024). Root text of the discipline: Vinaya Mula Sutra. BUDDHO, 3(2), 44–52.
Jubaedah, D., Zulbaidah, Syaripudin, D., Mahbub, M., & Fatoni, M. W. (2026). Beyond the six recognized religions: Comparative Madhhab perspectives on religious freedom and Indonesian constitutionalism. Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab. https://doi.org/10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.66738
Keown, D. (2020). Buddhist Ethics: A Very Short Introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198850052.001.0001
Kislowicz, H., & Berger, B. (2022). Religion, public law, and the refuge of formalism. Osgoode Hall Law Journal. https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/all_papers/346/
Leontiev, K. (2023). Religious reasons and liberal legitimacy. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 12(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwad021
Lukito, R., & Az-Zahra, M. S. (2026). Codification of Islamic law in comparative perspective: Between tradition and modernity. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v10.i1.31676
Madaio, J. (2022). Narrative shape of orthopraxy: Storytelling, Dharma, and the path to liberation in Advaita Vedānta. The Journal of Hindu Studies, 14(3), 326–377. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhs/hiab029
Markov, S., White, R., & Petkoff, P. (2023). Divine darkness and legal darkness: Apophasis, cataphasis and the making of legal cultures of the first millennium. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 36, 185–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-022-09955-w
Matan, M. (2025). Religious legal pluralism in the shadow of the centralistic state. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 45(3), 583–609. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaf010
Menski, W. (2017). Hindu Law: A New History of Dharmaśāstra. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198702603.001.0001
Negoiță, O.-A. (2023). “Making the Lord’s Table a Table of Demons”: Orthodoxy in faith, heterodoxy and orthopraxy in the works of Pachomios Rousanos. Studia Universitatis Babeș-Bolyai Theologia Orthodoxa.
Oraby, M., & Sullivan, W. F. (2020). Law and religion: Reimagining the entanglement of two universals. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 16, 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-020520-022638
Pahud de Mortanges, R. (2022). Same and yet different? A comparative look at Jewish, Christian, and Islamic law. Ancilla Iuris, 97–120. https://doi.org/10.26031/2022.097
Prebish, C. S. (2018). The Vinaya. In The Oxford Handbook of Buddhist Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Promta, S. (2024). A comparison between the ethics of Buddhism and the ethics of Immanuel Kant. Journal of Buddhist Studies Chulalongkorn University, 31(1).
Purwanto, E., & Silalahi, F. H. M. (2025). Symbiotic relationship between state and religion: Examining the relationship between secular law and religious morality in Indonesia. BONAFIDE: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.46558/bonafide.v6i1.396
Rahman, K. C. M., & Chakrabarti, A. (2022). Sharia, legal pluralism and Muslim personal law: Ethnographic lessons from the Mahallu system of Malabar, India. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 42(1), 160–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2022.2051946
Ralston, J. (2020). The difficulty with distinctions. In Law and the Rule of God: A Christian Engagement with Shari'a (pp. 139–198). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108779494.004
Sabato, D. (2024). “Meat from the heavens”: The prohibition on meat consumption imposed on Adam and the Jewish-Christian polemic. Harvard Theological Review, 117(3), 436–455. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816024000178
Schlesinger, C. (2025). Religious legal pluralism in the shadow of the centralistic state. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 45(3), 583–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaf010
Simion, M. G. (2024). Orthodox justification of collective violence: An epistemological and systematic framework. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 80(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v80i1.8513
Sinaga, I., Nurhayati, & Razali, H. A. M. (2022). Legal pluralism in the context of the distribution of women's inheritance: Constellation of state, Islamic and customary laws. Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab, 107–131. https://doi.org/10.24252/mh.vi.29786
Syarif, S., Herlambang, S., Budiyono, B., Pratama, G., Luthfi, F., & Paikah, N. (2026). Negotiating sacred law: Qur'anic hermeneutics, legal pluralism, and interfaith marriage in Muslim-majority countries. Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran, 25(2).
Sytsma, D. S. (2022). John Calvin on the intersection of natural, Roman, and Mosaic law. Perichoresis, 20(2), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.2478/perc-2022-0008
Tamanaha, B. Z. (2021). Legal Pluralism Explained: History, Theory, Consequences. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190861551.001.0001
Thatamanil, J. J. (2023). Comparative theology as process not conclusion. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Comparative Theology. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394160655.ch13
Thobroni, A. Y., & Yusuf, N. (2025). Interfaith families and the law in Indonesia: Islamic law, national policy, and human rights after Supreme Court Circular Number 2 of 2023. Antmind Review: Journal of Sharia and Legal Ethics. https://doi.org/10.63077/ax78aw
Thompson, S., & Modood, T. (2024). The normative structure of multicultural secularism. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 13(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwae030
Umar, N., Mawardi, I., Tsuji, A., & Haryanti, T. (2023). Reproduction of Islamic law in the era of globalization and pluralism. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 12(3), 629–654.
Vicittadhammo, P. N. (2024). Five precepts: Principles of conduct for value of life in the new normal way of life. Journal of Buddhist Innovation Review, 5(1), 135–148.
Volkova, V. A. (2024). The problems of free will and moral responsibility in Buddhist ethics. RUDN Journal of Philosophy, 28(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2024-28-1-109-119
Volokh, E. (2023). Protecting people from their own religious communities: Jane Doe in church and state. Journal of Law and Religion, 38(3), 354–375.
Wiedersheim, K. A. (2022). Dietrich Bonhoeffer: Ideology, praxis and his influence on the theology of liberation. Political Theology, 23(8), 721–738. https://doi.org/10.1080/1462317X.2021.1925438
Yazwardi, Y., Wijaya, S., & Erniwati, E. (2025). Negotiating religious moderation and legal pluralism in Indonesia: A socio-anthropological perspective. Kuriositas: Media Komunikasi Sosial dan Keagamaan, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.35905/kur.v18i1.12106
Yılmaz, M. (2022). Early Buddhist ethics—Its doctrine and discipline. Kırklareli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(1).
Yohanes, H. (2018). Model ortodoksi-ortopraksi-ortopati: Usulan model berteologi sebagai cara hidup kaum Injili di dunia pascakebenaran. Jurnal Amanat Agung, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.47754/jaa.v15i1.376
Zellentin, H. M. (2022). Law Beyond Israel: From the Bible to the Qur'an. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199675579.001.0001
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Djohny H Jehosua (Penulis)
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Ketentuan Lisensi
Karya yang diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini dilisensikan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Internasional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Ini berarti bahwa:
-
Atribusi (BY): Anda bebas untuk membagikan, menyalin, mendistribusikan ulang, mengubah, mengadaptasi, dan membangun materi ini dalam medium atau format apapun, hanya untuk tujuan nonkomersial, asalkan Anda memberikan kredit yang sesuai kepada penulis asli, menyediakan tautan ke lisensi, dan menyatakan jika ada perubahan yang dilakukan.
-
Penggunaan Non-Komersial (NC): Anda tidak boleh menggunakan materi ini untuk tujuan komersial. Penggunaan komersial berarti materi tersebut tidak ditujukan terutama untuk keuntungan komersial atau kompensasi moneter.
-
ShareAlike (SA): Jika Anda memodifikasi, meremix, atau mengadaptasi materi ini, Anda harus melisensikan materi yang telah dimodifikasi tersebut dengan ketentuan yang sama, yang berarti adaptasi Anda juga harus dilisensikan di bawah lisensi Creative Commons yang sama (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
-
Non-Eksklusivitas: Penulis mempertahankan hak untuk menggunakan karya ini dalam publikasi lain, presentasi, atau penggunaan pribadi, dengan syarat atribusi yang tepat diberikan.
-
Tanpa Pembatasan Tambahan: Anda tidak boleh menerapkan ketentuan hukum atau langkah teknis yang secara hukum membatasi orang lain untuk melakukan hal-hal yang diizinkan oleh lisensi ini.
-
Pemberi Lisensi: Penulis asli karya ini adalah pemberi lisensi, yang memberi Anda hak-hak yang dijelaskan dalam lisensi ini.
-
Tautan Lisensi: Untuk informasi lebih lanjut mengenai ketentuan lisensi ini, silakan kunjungi Creative Commons
