Internasionalisasi Taurat dan Pluralisme Kovenan: Rekonstruksi Teologis Posisi Yesus, Paulus, dan Jacob Emden terhadap Hukum bagi Bangsa-Bangsa

Penulis

  • Telda Anita Toar Sekolah Tinggi Teologi IKAT Jakarta Penulis
  • Andre Akijuwen, Jr Sekolah Tinggi Teologi IKAT Jakarta Penulis

Kata Kunci:

Hukum Nuh, Jacob Emden, Paulus, Pluralisme Kovenan, Taurat

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan merekonstruksi hubungan antara Taurat, bangsa-bangsa, dan status kovenan melalui analisis teologis terhadap posisi Yesus, Paulus, Dekrit Yerusalem, dan Jacob Emden, khususnya untuk menjelaskan bagaimana Taurat mengalami internasionalisasi tanpa kehilangan kontinuitasnya bagi Israel. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode analisis tekstual-hermeneutis dan teologi komparatif terhadap teks-teks Perjanjian Baru, terutama Matius 5:17–20, Galatia, Kisah Para Rasul 15, serta sumber rabbinik yang berkaitan dengan Jacob Emden dan Hukum Nuh. Penelitian menemukan bahwa internasionalisasi Taurat tidak merupakan pembatalan hukum, melainkan diferensiasi kewajiban berdasarkan status kovenan Yahudi dan non-Yahudi. Yesus dipahami dalam kerangka penggenapan Taurat, Paulus mengartikulasikan partisipasi bangsa-bangsa tanpa konversi etnis, sedangkan Dekrit Yerusalem menyediakan batas normatif bagi integrasi komunitas. Jacob Emden kemudian memberikan resepsi rabbinik yang membaca pola tersebut melalui Hukum Nuh. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa pluralisme kovenan dapat menjelaskan kontinuitas Taurat bagi Israel sekaligus inklusi bangsa-bangsa tanpa homogenisasi kewajiban hukum.

Unduhan

Data unduhan tidak tersedia.

Biografi Penulis

  • Telda Anita Toar, Sekolah Tinggi Teologi IKAT Jakarta

    Mahasiswi S2 Teologi STT IKAT Jakarta

  • Andre Akijuwen, Jr, Sekolah Tinggi Teologi IKAT Jakarta

    Mahasiswa STT IKAT Jakarta

Referensi

Alleson-Gerberg, S. A. (2019). The Sabbatian who devoured his son: Jacob Emden’s anti-Sabbatian polemics of cannibalism. AJS Review, 43(1), 1–25.

Banks, R. (1975). Jesus and the law in the Synoptic tradition. Cambridge University Press.

Banks, R. (2005). Jesus and the Law in the Synoptic Tradition. Cambridge University Press.

Bauckham, R. (1996). James and the Gentiles (Acts 15.13–21). In B. Witherington III (Ed.), History, literature, and society in the Book of Acts (pp. 154–184). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511555176.008

Boyarin, D. (1994). A Radical Jew: Paul and the Politics of Identity. University of California Press.

Boyarin, D. (2012). The Jewish Gospels: The Story of the Jewish Christ. The New Press.

Brackens, J. D. (2024). An artificial review of Jesus’s Torah compliance and what that might mean for Jews and Gentile Christians. Laws, 13(3), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws13030036

Bühner, R. A. (2024). Criticism from within: Paul’s relationship to Judaism in Gal 2:19 in the context of contemporary debates. Early Christianity, 15(2), 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1628/ec-2024-0015

Du Toit, P. L. G. (2024). Was Paul within Judaism, within Israel or within Israel’s Messiah? Religions, 15(10), 1217. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15101217

Dunn, J. D. G. (1984). Mark 2.1–3.6: A bridge between Jesus and Paul on the question of the Law. New Testament Studies, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688500007591

Ehrensperger, K. (2024). Israel and the nations: Who does Paul think they are? Religious Studies Review, 50(3), 539–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsr.17432

Fredriksen, P. (2022). What does it mean to see Paul “within Judaism”? Journal of Biblical Literature, 141(2), 359–380. https://doi.org/10.15699/jbl.1412.2022.9

Fredriksen, P. (2024). Paul within Judaism within paganism. Religions, 15(11), 1396. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15111396

Gargiulo, M. (2026). Matthew 5:17: The Jew Jesus and the Christian understanding of “fulfillment.” Studies in Christian-Jewish Relations, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.6017/scjr.v21i1.21694

Gaston, L. (1987). Paul and the Torah. University of British Columbia Press.

Gruenwald, I. (2008). Paul and the nomos in light of ritual theory. New Testament Studies, 54(3), 398–416.

Hartog, P. B. (2021). Noah and Moses in Acts 15: Group models and the novelty of the Way. New Testament Studies, 67(4), 496–513. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688521000199

Hewitt, J. T. (2022). Πνεῦμα, genealogical descent and things that do not exist according to Paul. New Testament Studies, 68, 239–252.

Huttunen, N. (2018). Paul and Epictetus on Law: A Comparison. T&T Clark.

Hwang, E.-Y. (2024). Francis X. Clooney’s method of comparative theology: Hybrid hermeneutics and spiritual exercise. Korea Journal of Christian Studies, 134, 217–251.

Hylton, A. (2015). Paul the Scholar: Rabbi Jacob Emden’s Insight. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 5(12), 1–[artikel].

Kärkkäinen, V.-M. (2022). Christian theology as comparative theology: Towards a radical change of “method.” Dialog, 61(4), 251–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/dial.12764

Larsson, E. (1985). Paul: Law and salvation. New Testament Studies, 31(3), 425–436. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688500013953

Lavender, J. (2023). Paul and the observance of the Torah by Gentiles. Neotestamentica, 57(2), 293–323. https://doi.org/10.1353/neo.2023.a943179

Levine, A.-J., & Brettler, M. Z. (Eds.). (2017). The Jewish Annotated New Testament (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

McDonald, D. N. (2022). ‘Ex-Pagan Pagans’? Paul, Philo, and Gentile ethnic reconfiguration. Journal for the Study of the New Testament, 45(1), 23–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142064X221082363

Morsel-Eisenberg, T. (2022). Mysticism, rationalism, and criticism: Rabbi Jacob Emden as an early modern critic and printer. Harvard Theological Review, 115(1), 110–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816022000074

Nanos, M. D. (1999). The Jewish context of the gentile audience addressed in Paul's Letter to the Romans. The Catholic Biblical Quarterly, 61(2), 283–304.

Nanos, M. D. (2017). Reading Paul Within Judaism: The Collected Essays of Mark D. Nanos, Vol. 1. Cascade Books.

Nanos, M. D. (2021). Re-framing Paul’s opposition to erga nomou as “rites of a custom” for proselyte conversion completed by the synecdoche “circumcision.” Journal of the Jesus Movement in Its Jewish Setting, 8, 75–115.

Nanos, M. D., & Zetterholm, M. (Eds.). (2015). Paul within Judaism: Restoring the First-Century Context to the Apostle. Fortress Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9m0vn7

Pitre, B. (2011). Jesus and the Jewish Roots of the Eucharist: Unlocking the Secrets of the Last Supper. Doubleday.

Rodríguez, R. (2024). The Ἰουδαῖος in Romans: First to the Gentile-become-Jew, then also to the Gentile-as-Gentile. The Catholic Biblical Quarterly, 86(1), 124–143. https://doi.org/10.1353/cbq.2024.a918373

Schacter, J. J. (2012). Rabbi Jacob Emden, Sabbatianism, and Frankism: Attitudes toward Christianity in the eighteenth century. In Brill Reference Library of Judaism (Vol. 33, pp. 359–396). Brill.

Seol, J. (2024). How did Paul fuse the law and faith through his rhetoric in Romans 1–4? Korean New Testament Studies, 31(1), 65–96. https://doi.org/10.31982/KNTS.2024.3.31.1.65

Sloan, P. T. (2023). Paul’s Jewish addressee in Romans 2–4: Revisiting recent conversations. The Journal of Theological Studies, 74(2), 516–566. https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/flad053

Staples, J. A. (2024). Ethnic transformation and Israel’s resurrection in the Pauline epistles and beyond: In grateful dialogue with reviewers. Religious Studies Review, 50(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/rsr.17452

Stenschke, C. (2024). Emissary to Jews in the diaspora and to some non-Jews, champion of Jewish monotheism and circumspect of diaspora Judaism: Paul of Tarsus in the Book of Acts. New Testament Studies, 70(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688523000218

Tait, M., & Oakes, P. (Eds.). (2019). Torah in the New Testament: Papers Delivered at the Manchester-Lausanne Seminar. T&T Clark.

Taylor, J. (2001). The Jerusalem decrees (Acts 15.20, 29 and 21.25) and the incident at Antioch (Gal 2.11–14). New Testament Studies, 47(3), 372–380. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688501000224

Thiessen, M. (2016). Paul and the Gentile Problem. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190271756.001.0001

Tomson, P. J. (2022). Paul, the rabbis, and the Gentiles: Conversing with Adi Ophir and Ishay Rosen-Zvi. NTT Journal for Theology and the Study of Religion, 76(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.5117/NTT2022.2.003.TOMS

van de Sandt, H. (1992). An explanation of Acts 15.6–21 in the light of Deuteronomy 4.29–35 (LXX). Journal for the Study of the New Testament, 14(46). https://doi.org/10.1177/0142064X9201404605

van Houwelingen, P. H. R. (2020). The Apostolic Decree and our meat menu: Reading Acts 15 in redemptive-historical perspective. Verbum Christi: Journal of Reformed Evangelical Theology, 2(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.51688/vc2.1.2015.art2

von Stosch, K. (2022). Methoden komparativer Theologie: Eine Fallstudie im Blick auf das islamische Recht. Ancilla Iuris, 47–65. https://doi.org/10.26031/2022.047

Wright, N. T. (2013). Paul and the Faithfulness of God. Fortress Press/SPCK.

Zellentin, H. M. (2022). Law Beyond Israel: From the Bible to the Qur’an. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199675579.001.0001

Zetterholm, K. (2024). A reception of Pauline ideas shaped by a Jewish milieu: The case of the Pseudo-Clementine Homilies. Religions, 15(8), 903. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15080903

Zoccali, C. (2023). Jews, Gentiles, and “in Christ” identity: A post-supersessionist reading of Philippians. Religions, 14(2), 131. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14020131

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2026-09-10

Terbitan

Vol 2 No 2 (2026): Jurnal Phos Φ Volume 2 Edisi 2 2026 (Agustus)

Bagian

Articles

Lisensi

Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Telda Anita Toar, Andre Akijuwen, Jr (Penulis)

Creative Commons License

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Ketentuan Lisensi

Karya yang diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini dilisensikan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Internasional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Ini berarti bahwa:

  • Atribusi (BY): Anda bebas untuk membagikan, menyalin, mendistribusikan ulang, mengubah, mengadaptasi, dan membangun materi ini dalam medium atau format apapun, hanya untuk tujuan nonkomersial, asalkan Anda memberikan kredit yang sesuai kepada penulis asli, menyediakan tautan ke lisensi, dan menyatakan jika ada perubahan yang dilakukan.

  • Penggunaan Non-Komersial (NC): Anda tidak boleh menggunakan materi ini untuk tujuan komersial. Penggunaan komersial berarti materi tersebut tidak ditujukan terutama untuk keuntungan komersial atau kompensasi moneter.

  • ShareAlike (SA): Jika Anda memodifikasi, meremix, atau mengadaptasi materi ini, Anda harus melisensikan materi yang telah dimodifikasi tersebut dengan ketentuan yang sama, yang berarti adaptasi Anda juga harus dilisensikan di bawah lisensi Creative Commons yang sama (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).

  • Non-Eksklusivitas: Penulis mempertahankan hak untuk menggunakan karya ini dalam publikasi lain, presentasi, atau penggunaan pribadi, dengan syarat atribusi yang tepat diberikan.

  • Tanpa Pembatasan Tambahan: Anda tidak boleh menerapkan ketentuan hukum atau langkah teknis yang secara hukum membatasi orang lain untuk melakukan hal-hal yang diizinkan oleh lisensi ini.

  • Pemberi Lisensi: Penulis asli karya ini adalah pemberi lisensi, yang memberi Anda hak-hak yang dijelaskan dalam lisensi ini.

  • Tautan Lisensi: Untuk informasi lebih lanjut mengenai ketentuan lisensi ini, silakan kunjungi Creative Commons

Cara Mengutip

Internasionalisasi Taurat dan Pluralisme Kovenan: Rekonstruksi Teologis Posisi Yesus, Paulus, dan Jacob Emden terhadap Hukum bagi Bangsa-Bangsa. (2026). Phos Φ, 2(2), 123-134. https://journal.ibas.us/index.php/Phos/article/view/109

##plugins.generic.shariff.share##