Qnoma and Hypostasis: A Comparative Study of Aramaic and Greek Christological Terminology

Abstract

Abstract: This study offers a comparative analysis of Qnoma and Hypostasis, two crucial terms in early Christian Christology, exploring their theological, linguistic, and philosophical implications within the Syriac and Greek traditions. Qnoma, rooted in the Syriac tradition, refers to the personal subsistence and unity of Christ's dual nature. At the same time, Hypostasis, derived from Greek philosophical thought, on Christ's essence and individual personhood. This research investigates the distinct theo focuses logical roles of these terms in explaining the relationship between Christ's humanity and divinity, particularly within the Nestorian and Chalcedonian frameworks.

Using a comparative methodological approach, the study examines historical texts, theological writings, and ecumenical discussions to distinguish the nuances between Qnoma and Hypostasis. This approach clarifies how these terms were employed to articulate the Incarnation and resolve complex theological issues surrounding the union of Christ's two natures. The findings demonstrate that while both terms aim to preserve the integrity of Christ's humanity and divinity, they arise from distinct cultural and philosophical contexts, leading to different Christological interpretations.

The study concludes that the distinction between Qnoma and Hypostasis is essential for understanding the development of Christological thought and resolving the theological tensions between Eastern and Western Christian traditions. By filling the gaps in previous scholarship, the research fosters a clearer path for ecumenical dialogue and contributes to a more nuanced understanding of early Christian theology. The comparative Analysis enriches our comprehension of the historical development of these terms and provides a framework for theological reconciliation and unity within the broader Christian community.