Dialektika Eskatologis Hukum Makanan: Rekonstruksi Teologis tentang Status Babi dalam Yudaisme, Kekristenan, dan Islam
Kata Kunci:
Babi, Eskatologi, Hukum Makanan, Mesias, YudaismeAbstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan merekonstruksi secara teologis status babi dalam horizon eskatologis serta menjelaskan hubungan antara hukum makanan, simbolisme babi, figur Mesianik, dan transformasi normativitas dalam Yudaisme, Kekristenan, dan Islam. Penelitian menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan teologi komparatif dan hermeneutika historis. Data dianalisis melalui pembacaan teks primer, literatur interpretatif, kategorisasi berdasarkan status normatif, fungsi simbolik, mekanisme eskatologis, dan otoritas Mesianik, kemudian dibandingkan melalui kerangka komparatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan tiga pola utama: kontinuitas-restoratif dalam tradisi Yahudi tertentu, eliminatif-restoratif dalam Islam, dan transformatif-penggenapan dalam Kekristenan. Temuan tersebut menunjukkan bahwa status babi bukan sekadar persoalan konsumsi, melainkan indikator kontinuitas hukum, kesucian, otoritas Mesianik, dan tatanan ideal akhir zaman. Penelitian ini berkontribusi dengan mengintegrasikan hukum makanan, status babi, simbol, Mesias, dan eskatologi dalam satu matriks analitis, sehingga memperluas kajian komparatif mengenai hubungan normativitas hukum dan imajinasi eskatologis. Temuan ini menegaskan pentingnya membedakan status normatif, fungsi simbolik, dan interpretasi eskatologis agar perbandingan lintas agama tetap kontekstual.
Unduhan
Referensi
Adler, Y. (2022). The Origins of Judaism: An Archaeological-Historical Reappraisal. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300254907.001.0001
Abu Baedah, S. S., Musolin, M. H., & Nurlaelah. (2026). Dialectics of Fiqh al-Ikhtilāf: A comparative Madhhab analysis of legal pluralism in contemporary Muslim societies. Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab. https://doi.org/10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.64995
Alma'itah, Q. S., & Haq, Z. U. (2022). The concept of Messiah in Abrahamic religions: A focused study of the eschatology of Sunni Islam. Heliyon, 8(3), e09080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09080
Angelini, A. (2021). The reception and idealization of the Torah in the Letter of Aristeas: The case of the dietary laws. Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel, 9(4), 435–447. https://doi.org/10.1628/hebai-2020-0027
Anggraeni, R. R. D. (2023). Islamic law and customary law in contemporary legal pluralism in Indonesia: Tension and constraints. AHKAM: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v23i1.32549
Ayoub, S. A. (2022). A theory of a state? How civil law ended legal pluralism in modern Egypt. Journal of Law and Religion, 37(1), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2021.79
Bajwa, K. S., & Miller, S. E. (2023). Liberalism versus liberalism: An analysis of Muslim-American amicus curiae arguments concerning complicity-based conscience claims. Journal of Law and Religion, 38(2), 224–248. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2023.12
Barnes, B. R. (2021). The Noahide Laws and the Universal Fellowship with God. Rocznik Teologii Katolickiej, 20, 5–32. https://repozytorium.uwb.edu.pl/jspui/handle/11320/12441
Berryman, J. (2024). Vows without a self. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Blanch, S. (2023). Legal pluralism and Islamic law in Australia. Australian Journal of Law and Religion, 3, 37–51.
Bodhiprasiddhinand, P. (2024). Buddhist ethics for improving health and well-being during pandemics like COVID-19 with special references to modern scientific experiments. Religions, 15(4), 511. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15040511
Boulouque, C. (2020). Another Modernity: Elia Benamozegh’s Jewish Universalism. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9781503612006.001.0001
Boulouque, C. (2020). Normativity and inclusivity in modernity: The role and limits of the Noahide laws. In Another Modernity: Elia Benamozegh’s Jewish Universalism (pp. 83–92). Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9781503612006.003.0008
Bowers, J. (2021). Accommodating difference: How is religious freedom protected when it clashes with other rights; is reasonable accommodation the key to levelling the field? Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 10(2), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwab008
Cherlow, E. (2024). The Noahide commandments in the Jerusalem Talmud from a Cairo Geniza fragment. Jewish Quarterly Review, 114(3), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1353/jqr.2024.a936351
Chouraqui, J.-P., Turck, D., Briend, A., Darmaun, D., Bocquet, A., Feillet, F., et al. (2021). Religious dietary rules and their potential nutritional and health consequences. International Journal of Epidemiology, 50(1), 12–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaa182
Chukwuma, O. G. (2022). Old Testament dietary laws in contemporary African Christian practice. Verbum et Ecclesia, 43(1), a2604. https://doi.org/10.4102/ve.v43i1.2604
Collins, J. J. (2017). The Invention of Judaism: Torah and Jewish Identity from Deuteronomy to Paul. University of California Press.
Cornille, C. (2023). Comparing the tertium comparationis in comparative religion and comparative theology. Zeitschrift für Religionswissenschaft, 31(2), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfr-2023-0027
Cuciniello, A. (2021). An emblematic Qur'ānic argument: The death of Jesus. Bibliotheca Orientalis, 78(3–4), 402–421. https://doi.org/10.2143/BIOR.78.3.3289920
Cuciniello, A. (2021). Jesus’ second coming in a fatwā by al-Suyūṭī. Islamochristiana, 47, 99–117. http://hdl.handle.net/10807/207522
Cuciniello, A. (2022). Investigating a controversial Islamic apocalyptic figure: The Dajjāl. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 33(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2022.2066323
Crowe, J. (2024). Natural law with and without God. Australian Journal of Law and Religion, 4, 17–33. https://doi.org/10.55803/w085n
Dane, P. (2025). In a time of crisis: Reflections on the fortieth anniversary of the Journal of Law and Religion. Journal of Law and Religion. Cambridge University Press.
Das, M. (2023). The legitimacy of Varnashrama Dharma in Indian Dharma Shastras: A critical analysis. International Education and Research Journal, 9(11).
Das, M. (2024). Pratiloma paranoia: Class hierarchy, conservatism, and ethics in classical Hindu law. Religions, 15(7), 820.
Davies, M. (2024). Comparative law and Christianity—A plank in the eye? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 44(1), 54–78.
Davis, D. R. (2023). Dharmaśāstra and the legal personality of deities in the Ayodhya verdicts (2010 & 2019). Contemporary South Asia. https://doi.org/10.1080/09584935.2023.2281649
Dadosky, J. D., & Krokus, C. (2022). What are comparative theologians doing when they are doing comparative theology? Studies in Interreligious Dialogue, 32(1), 67–93. https://doi.org/10.2143/SID.32.1.3290944
Driessen, M. D. (2025). Interreligious dialogue, conflict resolution and peacebuilding: A review. Religions, 16(2), 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16020150
Emon, A. M., Levering, M., & Novak, D. (Eds.). (2014). Natural Law: A Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Trialogue. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198706601.001.0001
Evershed, R. P., et al. (2021). Finding Oxford’s medieval Jewry using organic residue analysis, faunal records and historical documents. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-021-01282-8
Faisal, M., et al. (2024). Political theology: How God’s law is applied in the context of Indonesian democracy based on Pancasila. Cogent Arts & Humanities. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2407104
Farrell, D. (Ed.). (2023). Traditions of Natural Law in Medieval Philosophy. Catholic University of America Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.2711714
Fisher, M. J. (2024). Theology as embodied: How tangible theology offers a new invitation to embodied people. Dialog, 63, 174–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/dial.12860
Fischer, J. (2019). Keeping kosher or not keeping kosher in contemporary Denmark. Nordisk Judaistik/Scandinavian Jewish Studies, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.30752/nj.77168
Fleming, C. T. (2024). Dharmaśāstra and the legal personality of deities in the Ayodhya verdicts (2010 & 2019). Contemporary South Asia, 32(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/09584935.2023.2281649
Freidenreich, D. M. (2011). Foreigners and Their Food: Constructing Otherness in Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Law. University of California Press.
Freidenreich, D. M. (2015). Dietary law. In A. J. Silverstein & G. G. Stroumsa (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Abrahamic Religions (pp. 466–482). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697762.013.12
Friedberg, A., & Hoppe, J. (2021). Deuteronomy 14.3–21: An early exemplar of rewritten Scripture? Journal for the Study of the Old Testament, 45(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0309089220950341
Gladigow, B. (2018). Elements of a comparative methodology in the study of religion. Religions, 9(2), 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9020038
Gervais, W. M. (2023). Comparing moralities in the Abrahamic and Indic religions using cognitive science. Religions, 14(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14020203
Giles, J. (2023). The interrelationship between freedom of thought, conscience, and religion and the rule of law. Journal of Law and Religion, 38(3), 376–402. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2023.28
Grindheim, S. (2020). Jesus and the food laws revisited. Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus, 18(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455197-2019001
Hall, B., & Ferg, E. (2023). Orthodoxy, orthopraxy, and Locke’s arguments for toleration. Locke Studies, 22, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.5206/ls.2022.15111
Hariri, A., & Babussalam, B. (2024). Legal pluralism: Concept, theoretical dialectics, and its existence in Indonesia. Walisongo Law Review, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.21580/walrev.2024.6.2.25566
Hashmi, J. T. (2025). The Apocalypse of Peace: Eschatological pacifism in the Meccan Qur’an. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 35(4), 329–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2025.2484082
Hayes, C. (2015). What’s Divine about Divine Law? Early Perspectives. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691165196.001.0001
Hayes, C. (2021). Noah and Moses in Acts 15: Group models and the novelty of the way. New Testament Studies, 67(4), 496–513. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688521000199
Hosle, P. K., & Dai, B. (2025). Understanding the theology of natural and divine laws in the cultural and philosophical context of late Ming China. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies.
Itthipuyho, P. B. (2024). Root text of the discipline: Vinaya Mula Sutra. BUDDHO, 3(2), 44–52.
Jubaedah, D., Zulbaidah, Syaripudin, D., Mahbub, M., & Fatoni, M. W. (2026). Beyond the six recognized religions: Comparative Madhhab perspectives on religious freedom and Indonesian constitutionalism. Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab. https://doi.org/10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.66738
Kärkkäinen, V.-M. (2022). Christian theology as comparative theology: Towards a radical change of “method.” Dialog, 61(4), 251–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/dial.12764
Kalmenson, M., & Abraham, Z. (2023). Pork: Chazir (חֲזִיר) – When Pigs Fly. Chabad.org.
Keown, D. (2020). Buddhist Ethics: A Very Short Introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198850052.001.0001
Kildoo, J. M. (2022). Is incommensurability insurmountable? A modest response to some interpretations of George Lindbeck. The Journal of Religion, 102(3). https://doi.org/10.1086/719733
Kislowicz, H., & Berger, B. (2022). Religion, public law, and the refuge of formalism. Osgoode Hall Law Journal.
Kraemer, D. (2019). Dietary laws. Oxford Bibliographies in Jewish Studies. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199840730-0190
Kurtz, P. M. (2022). A historical, critical retrospective on historical criticism. In The New Cambridge Companion to Biblical Interpretation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108859226.003
Laia, H. Z., Sutrisno, J., & Wibowo, D. A. (2022). The Old Testament dietary laws was abolished according to Mark 7:19b? Theological Journal Kerugma, 5(2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.33856/kerugma.v5i2.256
Ledán, I. (2024). The Marcan reception of dietary laws. Sárospataki Füzetek, 28(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.59914/SF.28.2024.2.10
Leontiev, K. (2023). Religious reasons and liberal legitimacy. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 12(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwad021
Lever, J., Vandeventer, J. S., & Miele, M. (2023). The ontological politics of kosher food: Between strict orthodoxy and global markets. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 55(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X221127025
Lukito, R., & Az-Zahra, M. S. (2026). Codification of Islamic law in comparative perspective: Between tradition and modernity. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v10.i1.31676
Madaio, J. (2022). Narrative shape of orthopraxy: Storytelling, Dharma, and the path to liberation in Advaita Vedānta. The Journal of Hindu Studies, 14(3), 326–377. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhs/hiab029
Magonet, J. (2019). Kashrut—The Jewish dietary laws. Doshisha University Repository, 14, 63–76. https://doi.org/10.14988/re.2019.0000000203
Markov, S., White, R., & Petkoff, P. (2023). Divine darkness and legal darkness: Apophasis, cataphasis and the making of legal cultures of the first millennium. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 36, 185–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-022-09955-w
Matan, M. (2025). Religious legal pluralism in the shadow of the centralistic state. Dihapus sebagai duplikat/entri bermasalah dalam daftar asli; dipertahankan versi Schlesinger (2025).
Menski, W. (2017). Hindu Law: A New History of Dharmaśāstra. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198702603.001.0001
Moyaert, M. (2023). Comparative theology beyond religionization. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Comparative Theology. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394160655.ch36
Mujahidin, M. S. (2023). Religious eschatology: The doctrine of the coming of the Savior in the end times in the perspective of Abrahamic religion. Abrahamic Religions: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama, 3(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.22373/arj.v3i1.15967
Nurmansyah, I. (2019). Dialektika tafsir dan kemajuan pengetahuan dalam transplantasi organ babi pada manusia. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis.
Oraby, M., & Sullivan, W. F. (2020). Law and religion: Reimagining the entanglement of two universals. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 16, 257–276. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-020520-022638
Pahud de Mortanges, R. (2022). Same and yet different? A comparative look at Jewish, Christian, and Islamic law. Ancilla Iuris, 97–120. https://doi.org/10.26031/2022.097
Peña Jiménez, L. (2023). Between Kosher and Koolsher: Gourmetisation of Jewish cuisine in Buenos Aires. Archives on Food, Culture and Nutrition, 1(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.17398/3020-3635.1.43
Praditya, L. (2022). Comparative theology for the Reformed tradition in Indonesia: A proposal. Verbum Christi: Journal of Reformed Evangelical Theology, 9(1), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.51688/VC9.1.2022.art5
Prebish, C. S. (2018). The Vinaya. In The Oxford Handbook of Buddhist Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Price, M. D. (2020). Evolution of a Taboo: Pigs and People in the Ancient Near East. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197543276.001.0001
Promta, S. (2024). A comparison between the ethics of Buddhism and the ethics of Immanuel Kant. Journal of Buddhist Studies Chulalongkorn University, 31(1).
Purwanto, E., & Silalahi, F. H. M. (2025). Symbiotic relationship between state and religion: Examining the relationship between secular law and religious morality in Indonesia. BONAFIDE: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.46558/bonafide.v6i1.396
Ralston, J. (2020). The difficulty with distinctions. In Law and the Rule of God: A Christian Engagement with Shari'a (pp. 139–198). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108779494.004
Rahman, K. C. M., & Chakrabarti, A. (2022). Sharia, legal pluralism and Muslim personal law: Ethnographic lessons from the Mahallu system of Malabar, India. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 42(1), 160–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2022.2051946
Resnick, I. (2011). Dietary laws in medieval Christian-Jewish polemics: A survey. Studies in Christian-Jewish Relations, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.6017/scjr.v6i1.1801
Roscoe, P. (2021). Comparative method. In R. A. Segal & N. P. Roubekas (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to the Study of Religion. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119092797.ch11
Rosenblum, J. D. (2016). The Jewish Dietary Laws in the Ancient World. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139032969
Rosenblum, J. D. (2024). Forbidden: A 3,000-Year History of Jews and the Pig. New York University Press.
Rudolph, D. J. (2002). Jesus and the food laws: A reassessment of Mark 7:19b. Evangelical Quarterly, 74(4), 291–311. https://doi.org/10.1163/27725472-07404001
Sabato, D. (2024). “Meat from the heavens”: The prohibition on meat consumption imposed on Adam and the Jewish-Christian polemic. Harvard Theological Review, 117(3), 436–455. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816024000178
Saidin, N., & Yaakob, M. A. Z. (2025). Permissible and prohibited animals in Islam: Insights from the Qur’an and Hadis. Journal of Halal Science and Management Research, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.24191/jhsmr.v1i1.8993
Saritoprak, Z. (2014). Islam’s Jesus. Oxford University Press.
Schlesinger, C. (2025). Religious legal pluralism in the shadow of the centralistic state. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 45(3), 583–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaf010
Schorsch, J. (2018). The Food Movement, Culture, and Religion: A Tale of Pigs, Christians, Jews, and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71706-7
Shofiyudin, M., Susilawati, C., Herdiana, D., & Bhatti, O. K. (2026). Legal certainty and consumer protection in halal certification of children's snacks containing pork: A Sharia economic law perspective. ASAS. https://doi.org/10.24042/asas.1801.30496
Shuhaimi, A. A. M., Karim, S. A., & Mohamad, S. F. (2022). A review on halal and kosher regulations, certifications, and industrial practices. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v12-i2/12175
Simion, M. G. (2024). Orthodox justification of collective violence: An epistemological and systematic framework. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 80(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v80i1.8513
Sinaga, I., Nurhayati, & Razali, H. A. M. (2022). Legal pluralism in the context of the distribution of women's inheritance: Constellation of state, Islamic and customary laws. Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab, 107–131. https://doi.org/10.24252/mh.vi.29786
Staples, J. A. (2019). “Rise, kill, and eat”: Animals as nations in early Jewish visionary literature and Acts 10. Journal for the Study of the New Testament, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0142064X19855564
Syarif, S., Herlambang, S., Budiyono, B., Pratama, G., Luthfi, F., & Paikah, N. (2026). Negotiating sacred law: Qur'anic hermeneutics, legal pluralism, and interfaith marriage in Muslim-majority countries. Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran, 25(2).
Sytsma, D. S. (2022). John Calvin on the intersection of natural, Roman, and Mosaic law. Perichoresis, 20(2), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.2478/perc-2022-0008
Tamanaha, B. Z. (2021). Legal Pluralism Explained: History, Theory, Consequences. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190861551.001.0001
Thatamanil, J. J. (2023). Comparative theology as process not conclusion. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Comparative Theology. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394160655.ch13
Thobroni, A. Y., & Yusuf, N. (2025). Interfaith families and the law in Indonesia: Islamic law, national policy, and human rights after Supreme Court Circular Number 2 of 2023. Antmind Review: Journal of Sharia and Legal Ethics. https://doi.org/10.63077/ax78aw
Thompson, S., & Modood, T. (2024). The normative structure of multicultural secularism. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 13(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwae030
Tieman, M., & Hassan, F. (2015). Convergence of food systems: Kosher, Christian and Halal. British Food Journal, 117(9), 2313–2327. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-02-2015-0058
Topel, M. F. (2024). The Sacred and the Impure in Judaism: Law, Food, and Identity. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197677667.001.0001
Umar, N., Mawardi, I., Tsuji, A., & Haryanti, T. (2023). Reproduction of Islamic law in the era of globalization and pluralism. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 12(3), 629–654.
Van den Heever, G. (2020). Comparative hermeneutics, social action, and metanarratives: A response. Scriptura, 119(2). https://doi.org/10.7833/119-2-1790
Vicittadhammo, P. N. (2024). Five precepts: Principles of conduct for value of life in the new normal way of life. Journal of Buddhist Innovation Review, 5(1), 135–148.
Volkova, V. A. (2024). The problems of free will and moral responsibility in Buddhist ethics. RUDN Journal of Philosophy, 28(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2024-28-1-109-119
Volokh, E. (2023). Protecting people from their own religious communities: Jane Doe in church and state. Journal of Law and Religion, 38(3), 354–375.
Weiss, D. H. (2020). Bloodshed and the ethics and theopolitics of the Jewish dietary laws. In A. Gross (Ed.), Feasting and Fasting: The History and Ethics of Jewish Food (pp. 287–304). NYU Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479899333.003.0017
Wiedersheim, K. A. (2022). Dietrich Bonhoeffer: Ideology, praxis and his influence on the theology of liberation. Political Theology, 23(8), 721–738. https://doi.org/10.1080/1462317X.2021.1925438
Williams, L. (2024). The stomach purifies all foods: Jesus’ anatomical argument in Mark 7.18–19. New Testament Studies, 70(3), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688523000516
Yazwardi, Y., Wijaya, S., & Erniwati, E. (2025). Negotiating religious moderation and legal pluralism in Indonesia: A socio-anthropological perspective. Kuriositas: Media Komunikasi Sosial dan Keagamaan, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.35905/kur.v18i1.12106
Yılmaz, M. (2022). Early Buddhist ethics—Its doctrine and discipline. Kırklareli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(1).
Yohanes, H. (2018). Model ortodoksi-ortopraksi-ortopati: Usulan model berteologi sebagai cara hidup kaum Injili di dunia pascakebenaran. Jurnal Amanat Agung, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.47754/jaa.v15i1.376
Yusoff, M. F. B. M., & Ismail, M. Y. (2023). Sunni Ḥadīth and continuous commentaries on the eschatological Mahdī: A literary analysis. Religions, 14(4), 499. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14040499
Zellentin, H. M. (2022). Law Beyond Israel: From the Bible to the Qur'an. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199675579.001.0001
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Karol Ayomi , Andre Akijuwen, Jr (Penulis)
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Ketentuan Lisensi
Karya yang diterbitkan dalam jurnal ini dilisensikan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 Internasional (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Ini berarti bahwa:
-
Atribusi (BY): Anda bebas untuk membagikan, menyalin, mendistribusikan ulang, mengubah, mengadaptasi, dan membangun materi ini dalam medium atau format apapun, hanya untuk tujuan nonkomersial, asalkan Anda memberikan kredit yang sesuai kepada penulis asli, menyediakan tautan ke lisensi, dan menyatakan jika ada perubahan yang dilakukan.
-
Penggunaan Non-Komersial (NC): Anda tidak boleh menggunakan materi ini untuk tujuan komersial. Penggunaan komersial berarti materi tersebut tidak ditujukan terutama untuk keuntungan komersial atau kompensasi moneter.
-
ShareAlike (SA): Jika Anda memodifikasi, meremix, atau mengadaptasi materi ini, Anda harus melisensikan materi yang telah dimodifikasi tersebut dengan ketentuan yang sama, yang berarti adaptasi Anda juga harus dilisensikan di bawah lisensi Creative Commons yang sama (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
-
Non-Eksklusivitas: Penulis mempertahankan hak untuk menggunakan karya ini dalam publikasi lain, presentasi, atau penggunaan pribadi, dengan syarat atribusi yang tepat diberikan.
-
Tanpa Pembatasan Tambahan: Anda tidak boleh menerapkan ketentuan hukum atau langkah teknis yang secara hukum membatasi orang lain untuk melakukan hal-hal yang diizinkan oleh lisensi ini.
-
Pemberi Lisensi: Penulis asli karya ini adalah pemberi lisensi, yang memberi Anda hak-hak yang dijelaskan dalam lisensi ini.
-
Tautan Lisensi: Untuk informasi lebih lanjut mengenai ketentuan lisensi ini, silakan kunjungi Creative Commons
